The House of Representatives is considering a measure to block federal funding for a mandate that would require technology in vehicles to detect and shut down vehicles if they detect impaired driving. The proposal, introduced by Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, seeks to halt the implementation of the mandate.
The Controversial Mandate
The mandate, which became law as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, requires automobile manufacturers to equip all new vehicles with cameras and sensors to detect intoxication and other dangerous driving behaviors. The technology would prevent cars from operating if the sensors determine that the driver is impaired.
However, critics argue that the technology is imperfect, intrusive, and could lead to unconstitutional surveillance. They also express concerns about the potential for misinterpretation, leaving motorists stranded in hazardous conditions.
Opposition to the Mandate
Representative Massie likens the technology to a “kill switch” for cars and has introduced legislation to block funding for the mandate for one year. He believes that most Republicans and even Democrats will support his effort due to concerns about potential harm to motorists.
The proposed amendment will be debated in Congress, and if it passes, it will be included in the House version of the 2024 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development funding bill. Ultimately, it may make its way to President Biden’s desk as part of the spending measure.
Supporters and Critics
Advocates for the mandate, such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving and public health advocacy groups, argue that the technology could save thousands of lives by preventing alcohol-related accidents. However, critics, including the American Beverage Institute, are concerned about false readings and the potential for intrusive and inaccurate surveillance.
The Future of the Mandate
The DADSS (Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety) technology, which the mandate aims to implement, measures driver intoxication without requiring the driver to perform any actions like blowing into a breathalyzer. It is still under development and would eventually be expanded to detect other hazardous situations such as distracted driving and fatigue.
While lawmakers debate the merits of the mandate, the goal of reducing alcohol-related driving fatalities remains. However, finding a balance between safety, accuracy, and personal privacy will be key in the implementation of such technologies.
